Transparent fictional composite examples showing how SERPIFAI frameworks apply across SaaS, local services, healthcare, ecommerce and professional services. Each publication has a distinct research purpose, editorial form and controlled relationship to the wider SERPIFAI decision system.
Worked Competitive Decision Examples
This collection groups independent publications without flattening them into one repeated framework template. Each page preserves its governing model, evidence boundary and relationship to adjacent research.
A section-by-section model for a traceable competitive decision brief, including evidence states, execution ownership and reversal conditions.
Worked examples · Worked exampleWorked Example: Building an Ecommerce Competitor SetThis fictional composite shows how an ecommerce business can separate product substitutes, retailers, marketplaces, publishers and manufacturer references.
Worked examples · Worked exampleWorked Example: Competitor Selection for a Local Service BusinessThis fictional composite demonstrates how service radius, availability, offer fit and local decision behaviour should control competitor selection.
Worked examples · Worked exampleWorked Example: Competitor Selection for a Professional-Services FirmA fictional professional-services case separating commercial substitutes from publishers, associations, directories and software alternatives.
Worked examples · Worked exampleWorked Example: Evidence Governance in a Healthcare MarketThis fictional composite demonstrates a higher evidence threshold for healthcare competitor analysis without making clinical or patient-outcome claims.
Worked examples · Worked exampleWorked Example: Qualifying Competitors for a B2B SaaS CompanyA transparent fictional composite showing how to qualify a B2B SaaS competitor set without confusing visibility, integrations and buyer substitutability.
Publication and review standard
One primary search and decision intent per route.
No fabricated outcomes or unsupported precision.
Founder reviewed by Pero Baldjiev until approval is recorded.
Material conclusions state when they should change.
Editorial and Review Standard · Founder and methodology responsibility